X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h= subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=beta; bh= qkyToUdusf4yndfKTDdY6EsrGfOMaFiC8xboReCpweo=; b=ffLPS79PZU0ALem6 8IM66UcgdfvopysZgux78o9P2Z05RV+eqnpodGcQi3pCyooWfhnWCaiFhO3TqmD4 +tfGDY0n/B1FbsDfC6eGSY84+Gk6/hJAwesNCvkFR7F0Ew2LGYiQ7zETRui7jmAb R1R/wRcnKogi9GWLatLU2oVR2SA= Subject: Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <55E8773B DOT 9000902 AT jump-ing DOT de> From: "Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Message-ID: <55E8831A.8050307@jump-ing.de> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 19:27:54 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Am 03.09.2015 um 19:05 schrieb Roland Lutz: > It's basically the same code, so (except > for the inevitable bugs) there should only be some minor, > well-documented differences. Does this mean one can take all the commits from your fork and simply apply them to the official repo? >> In fact it may be a good opportunity to get rid of some old cruft. > > What in particular do you consider worth getting rid of? I have no idea how a netlister works, I want to encourage you to help re-duplicating efforts. Having an improved netlister, but shipping the other one is somewhat pointless. As it is to put big efforts into a netlister which is used by only one person on this planet. Markus -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter http://www.jump-ing.de/