X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IGMraZ3oAhONT65MxhgjFfOoA3vlf+Tg6NXyrPCzeiE=; b=h8VdDRhXekW1fw60cbC9PmoZYMDXv+jPDa9QIMyxGBFG4UYzs9O/z35g1h2x1yjo0Y OdN3YzpxIGO7XRM4vCQtX9vw02Ds86zaQOu6RNprtlnszcTvtjyqqWdmj7nAikci2zsR mIG9byo3avSj4vcArEMqxNPqL87qmHCBN2/BbIk9wtMTA/b3hJHfnia3KVmQ8Rscoak8 XyERGz4lgrHE7PLKuxbs0NgipnA1mQiYZvLd1cIekmx3oBlMsjRduHvLDtqHgRB2UJzj 5c6WaULWP78n28M27My8+V15odFWIT6EKyqD8Q0NjfFZ975ily2jlQ3NmxX9bRp87Qry DXBQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.64.7 with SMTP id k7mr13457782lbs.31.1441158635948; Tue, 01 Sep 2015 18:50:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55E64B10.1060007@jump-ing.de> References: <55E5A6BA DOT 4030606 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509011657 DOT t81Gve9d017777 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <1441151947 DOT 12067 DOT 57 DOT camel AT benjamin-hp-g70> <55E64B10 DOT 1060007 AT jump-ing DOT de> Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 01:50:35 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] gCode output From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t821ohBT005731 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Am 02.09.2015 um 01:59 schrieb Benjamin L. Naber: >> So I'm curious, under what standard was the gCode generator built? > > To the standard of a LinuxCNC controlled machine as well as to a Teacup Firmware driven one. There's a checkbox at the bottom of the dialog to switch between these two. These two choices cover a wide range of milling machines. LinuxCNC formerly EMC (enhanced machine controller) was originally a NIST project to produce a standard test platform for compliance with the g code standard. >> Having experimented with a handful of EDA gcode generators, every single >> one outputs a different style of gcode. And, too add to this mess, every >> single CAM and machine controller responds differently to gcode styles. >> >> This is very annoying. >> >> I also notice that no one sticks to a standard of something such as >> turning on a spindle, specifying speed, and so on. > > The trick is to read a machine's manual and to adjust a given G-code program to match what's written there. If you find this annoying, such a machine and this software is not for you. > >> ... yet another damn program in the toolchain to generate a PCB >> from a pretty picture on the screen? > > When you're positive to stop yelling and whining and invest some time to find a solution for your case you can try again. I won't defend software which is the result of hundreds of hours of my work and which I provide for free. Maybe you had more respect if I'd ask for $ 5'000 for your download. +1 > Markus > > -- > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter > http://www.jump-ing.de/ -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/