X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 03:47:15 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: "Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] back annotation - phase 2, call for contributors In-Reply-To: <55E611B2.2010901@jump-ing.de> Message-ID: References: <55E5A6BA DOT 4030606 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509011657 DOT t81Gve9d017777 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201509011718 DOT t81HIR58018562 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201509011746 DOT t81Hk2SJ019528 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55E611B2 DOT 2010901 AT jump-ing DOT de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > Am 01.09.2015 um 20:00 schrieb gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu: >> I am trying to decide between "svn and I do the stuff without having >> to worry" and "git, let a contributor do it and hope it will get >> merged". > > That's not the distinction. I know it's not the distinction for you. That is the distinction for me, if you are willing to understand _my_ point of view.