X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vr+QoEZy81hWwkp+i9h8xeOXhYXWLcnwz/FWIGq6dns=; b=EbjLw+B4XK3e1l5ndFROv1pJMpY1f/ZqEGy3o1h4C6QWpLK0MQiPO3m4GgFcsYTlW6 d+8tTBJXE9orJSLdlOC/uDk0xZCevKZacuVr43jczpEYG4/7ZtPK2DxCmyksVwl5xEyq eF/m2pRbrlJeFliM7jjKYisuIwkOunH8Q5rR6y2Yx4fZpFJdaPC8I3PP5loHTBHGmAWc XUYVf4czLt2dQmA3nzEMv0fsrZHXzXxZ2aEXEG+ol2pUB6NAtHrAnwi1ZESf2Uaa6h4J RMehWEDdDY4jD8ReiYKcwN1IQZV0Li5Xi1QCrUnYNz71VYgv2RXHRTGrxzp1xTgv1Rv+ 3RZw== X-Received: by 10.180.73.229 with SMTP id o5mr1171660wiv.36.1441087508628; Mon, 31 Aug 2015 23:05:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 08:05:03 +0200 From: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] back annotation proposal (RFC) Message-Id: <20150901080503.3edcbe5534bb0860395f8cd6@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <201508301802 DOT t7UI2twS031311 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201508310341 DOT t7V3fcfh022966 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150831111604 DOT 5b1bb421bc015de9a848e8a9 AT gmail DOT com> <55E42456 DOT 5080309 AT jump-ing DOT de> <20150831112032 DOT GA8963 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <20150831134127 DOT 9dccc4c2563ce7bba5ded79d AT gmail DOT com> <55E46E18 DOT 7060102 AT ecosensory DOT com> <20150831220701 DOT 929d36b81e49e264f37e61a5 AT gmail DOT com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 03:53:15 +0200 (CEST) gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > > > On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > > PADS have a forward and backward option in this is an expensive software so it certainly work. > > I don't know PADS but this logic is surely flawed. I see too many > expensive software that works suboptimmaly or doesn't work at all. > > > If changes are kept in different files and/or some scripts need to be > > run I see as a variation on the same scheme. > > Have you read my proposal? > > Regards, > > Igor2 PADS method actually feels a little bit late add on. I think I forgot you proposal.