X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:09:52 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv To: "Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu" From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu Subject: Re: [geda-user] high freq, trace lengths (was: pcb-rnd feature poll: please vote) In-Reply-To: <20150727104850.GA31438@visitor2.iram.es> Message-ID: References: <201507251534 DOT t6PFYRiK016181 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201507260205 DOT t6Q257OU004585 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150727081830 DOT GC31594 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> <20150727104850 DOT GA31438 AT visitor2 DOT iram DOT es> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, 27 Jul 2015, Gabriel Paubert (paubert AT iram DOT es) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: Thanks for the details! I have one question about stubs. > In both cases: > - these are point to point signals and stubs are essentially prohibited, http://nxp.com/documents/application_note/AN10935.pdf fig 4 on page 9 shows how two DDR rams connected to a single MCU. There are regular T junctions there. I guess with proper trace lengths/impedances/termination this should be possible. I've seen such topology (in application notes) before, that made me think the best would be to calculate lengths independently on all the three arms of the T. Does this idea make sense? Regards, Igor2