X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 20:10:56 -0400
Message-Id: <201507220010.t6M0Aubb030157@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <1033AA08-6F76-45E8-957A-4599C90F4BD9@noqsi.com> (message from
	John Doty on Tue, 21 Jul 2015 18:05:04 -0600)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] My gschem 1.9.1 is breaking rubber bands
References: <1437430095 DOT 1321 DOT 17 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507211410260 DOT 2035 AT nimbus> <3B92001A-596F-4595-9DD3-15AAD3C3B1FF AT noqsi DOT com> <1437494996 DOT 729 DOT 7 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <0C548460-0355-4EFF-9495-75DE7AD13A16 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAOFvGD4ijprW7hoaJNYjo55A1=mnQuWCiK7Sku_WqC3NeUzgQw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201507211821 DOT t6LILegK016798 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55AE9814 DOT 4030702 AT ecosensory DOT com> <D24828BF-54B9-40A5-A51C-640EEAEC3D00 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAC4O8c8pKqq8kai14rgjU7stXPTufNX+w7i=2Ty5pxU2cTKLXA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1033AA08-6F76-45E8-957A-4599C90F4BD9 AT noqsi DOT com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Because it tries to guess whether a dangling net end is intentional,

It doesn't need to guess if the dangling net is intentional, it only
needs to guess if the dangling net is dangling.  If the logic
correctly identifies dangling nets, it's not flawed.  If it's giving
you information you don't want, just ignore it.  If it's helping
people find problems in their schematics, even if it's not helping
*everyone*, then it's overall a useful feature (assuming the presence
of a red dot doesn't somehow prevent others from producing otherwise
valid schematics).