X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=3K7dfgWteyx2VUhoxW3skm9qWdITJl+28fevas6c0AM=; b=l8P2ELZipbjPNE0QEp/FoO1UVQNkuvAQaJ5bOKzI9RB5awYndpghv80Co5QOFGFQZk 6xq9MGq8t0IwLtsTi9F/D05LRzxFuPKnPrKXbGXSSl+HVTwT2ITEoP7arsZ1QmXy5Cw7 KDMQzVuShAjzYeU12RLsZ+PEYoSENCqSZpz/B75U5VX89JdII4z4R+gDp22X7wNFEt5L 0KQgIR2HcRDUWkUpHdlR9Yg9erwM7/KBL84qQrJJ8RVEHeAnltssWkzMSX+HjBcR0Nwz LEak2D0C/niM5fhu+QdSVDuWn2IlUagJvW1qJeaRa8emmNCo/fiel4kJJdHa1/VDqJxG aUkQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.124.164 with SMTP id mj4mr34890723lbb.3.1437523758434; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 17:09:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1437430095 DOT 1321 DOT 17 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <3B92001A-596F-4595-9DD3-15AAD3C3B1FF AT noqsi DOT com> <1437494996 DOT 729 DOT 7 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <0C548460-0355-4EFF-9495-75DE7AD13A16 AT noqsi DOT com> <201507211821 DOT t6LILegK016798 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55AE9814 DOT 4030702 AT ecosensory DOT com> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 20:09:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] My gschem 1.9.1 is breaking rubber bands From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:44 AM, John Doty wrote: >> >> On Jul 21, 2015, at 1:05 PM, John Griessen wrote: >> >>> I would not mind seeing a red dot appear when the netlist via rat lines goes open circuit. >> >> Another heuristic? Please, no. We already have the misfeature that gschem decorates open net segment ends differently by a flawed heuristic. > > How is it flawed? Because you sometimes want dangling net ends? I haven't > seen this feature screw up and wouldn't want it to go away. This is why I suggested instead of drawing short net lines with netname attributes attached to make the connections. The connections would be there and you would have the red blocks to indicate where the changes were made. I can only guess that John D. dislikes having to place the NA, Input, Output, I/O or Passive symbols at the end of his nets. Really I think they are ugly with out something at the end. > Britton -Evan -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/