X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [geda-user] My gschem 1.9.1 is breaking rubber bands
From: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4O8c8pKqq8kai14rgjU7stXPTufNX+w7i=2Ty5pxU2cTKLXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 18:05:04 -0600
Message-Id: <1033AA08-6F76-45E8-957A-4599C90F4BD9@noqsi.com>
References: <1437430095 DOT 1321 DOT 17 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507211410260 DOT 2035 AT nimbus> <3B92001A-596F-4595-9DD3-15AAD3C3B1FF AT noqsi DOT com> <1437494996 DOT 729 DOT 7 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <0C548460-0355-4EFF-9495-75DE7AD13A16 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAOFvGD4ijprW7hoaJNYjo55A1=mnQuWCiK7Sku_WqC3NeUzgQw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201507211821 DOT t6LILegK016798 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55AE9814 DOT 4030702 AT ecosensory DOT com> <D24828BF-54B9-40A5-A51C-640EEAEC3D00 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAC4O8c8pKqq8kai14rgjU7stXPTufNX+w7i=2Ty5pxU2cTKLXA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t6M05CPH022933
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Jul 21, 2015, at 5:39 PM, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:44 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Jul 21, 2015, at 1:05 PM, John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I would not mind seeing a red dot appear when the netlist via rat lines goes open circuit.
>> 
>> Another heuristic? Please, no. We already have the misfeature that gschem decorates open net segment ends differently by a flawed heuristic.
> 
> How is it flawed?  Because you sometimes want dangling net ends?  I haven't
> seen this feature screw up and wouldn't want it to go away.

Because it tries to guess whether a dangling net end is intentional, but it doesn’t know my intentions. Sometimes it’s wrong.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com