X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=av23EGEv4RqZGZkP9SPpUO/XA56uD7yrbO97c3nZewc=;
        b=glyw42OHw5DC9qQrqzuavFNH+Oazfnl4qz/Xh0B5o2m1yi2pM+Hnf3YFvS2aKH3Ew/
         ga8POO34ZZS2rmnhfk1xhT+M+u9v176W6PcOLan0jLQfSOWbeO4slnm1w2KHy8rCngfi
         1Ima9HFxNI3S2svUzdaIHO9IBhDxiOSZZz6lor+3gVUjSyKenuc1sfVFpiXJJPbLB4gC
         NL45TB5vL3MCMzC8IXjcMqSBrGSnTS6trn8jVVdsuIiVutwOQHAjwiotMMs2Z56dyX2e
         tAlDb/MRCYrW+DB2NLiPmQj+JOakqVUO6ssMMpdPrjuBBCqOD9xvQHf0cLbyUaZS4w5x
         VG0g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.89.5 with SMTP id bk5mr73907724wjb.144.1437521960610;
 Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <D24828BF-54B9-40A5-A51C-640EEAEC3D00@noqsi.com>
References: <1437430095 DOT 1321 DOT 17 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507211410260 DOT 2035 AT nimbus>
	<3B92001A-596F-4595-9DD3-15AAD3C3B1FF AT noqsi DOT com>
	<1437494996 DOT 729 DOT 7 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<0C548460-0355-4EFF-9495-75DE7AD13A16 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAOFvGD4ijprW7hoaJNYjo55A1=mnQuWCiK7Sku_WqC3NeUzgQw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201507211821 DOT t6LILegK016798 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<55AE9814 DOT 4030702 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<D24828BF-54B9-40A5-A51C-640EEAEC3D00 AT noqsi DOT com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:39:20 -0800
Message-ID: <CAC4O8c8pKqq8kai14rgjU7stXPTufNX+w7i=2Ty5pxU2cTKLXA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] My gschem 1.9.1 is breaking rubber bands
From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 11:44 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Jul 21, 2015, at 1:05 PM, John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com> wrote:
>
>> I would not mind seeing a red dot appear when the netlist via rat lines goes open circuit.
>
> Another heuristic? Please, no. We already have the misfeature that gschem decorates open net segment ends differently by a flawed heuristic.

How is it flawed?  Because you sometimes want dangling net ends?  I haven't
seen this feature screw up and wouldn't want it to go away.

Britton