X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=GHZiLuZvFAFvEiqgDdy2oIEl1XDUF7+mvcIpLJLrEtM=; b=TTzbNB2bBBNx3CR58y3sp1m82bKFtIeyquRJSMU9ZEB8MO8rKWsGYj5oI58JtX+dMH 5FqYXLclG54yY5sJHQ4D7CKh3KDbZ3ktTuCrDi8SDhaAWOpUc8YEmYRc4NKdHYV0wPZJ MqWzJe0ZaVnSwud50mlmmD0WRVDirS5vTrJdkH4qtpDXVoNYeifVRazYMKq3Eyc9n6px IIbb1loXYpsjO7ta6Ewquwd2/c/dLUHMgxAmYJZ3QKbbWK+962UZBit3sQWsrLFLpXBW RN1ZamhCCUYX5IAH5rz4SoELygCiyxDBSTSNdnA6oI2WQZyrxprM9Ee+2GWmhaaETxYw /gbw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.164.35 with SMTP id yn3mr6478200lbb.91.1437002763962; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:26:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55A6E776.7070207@ecosensory.com> References: <55A2E9B7 DOT 9040502 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150713131707 DOT GA782 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov> <55A4042E DOT 5060402 AT neurotica DOT com> <55A41B30 DOT 50602 AT neurotica DOT com> <254F9AFE-1A3E-4D88-BABF-E6E0F87A56B1 AT icloud DOT com> <1436960577 DOT 1072 DOT 6 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <201507151820 DOT t6FIKYME001704 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <201507152007 DOT t6FK7lv8005229 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <24AD56C6-B7C2-4D7E-B69A-F68DBACCBFDC AT noqsi DOT com> <292F3B74-B990-4C3D-BF4B-4458A6DFBCC4 AT noqsi DOT com> <55A6E776 DOT 7070207 AT ecosensory DOT com> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 23:26:03 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] appropriate discussion From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:06 PM, John Griessen wrote: > On 07/15/2015 04:26 PM, John Doty wrote: >> >> thing about geda-gaf is that it supports many paths. > > > > And there is no danger of losing such function as it is improved. There have been times when people have considered growing things in ways that would have been faster but more constrictive. -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/