X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:51:08 -0400
Message-Id: <201507152051.t6FKp8ip006830@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <24AD56C6-B7C2-4D7E-B69A-F68DBACCBFDC@noqsi.com> (message from
	John Doty on Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:37:32 -0600)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] The new to do
References: <CAM2RGhQ70Pex5aNeQ86vKHc7sKf_Vpws69__CPb2QKg6fJTeHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <55A2A0A2 DOT 4080403 AT ecosensory DOT com> <7AE39440-DA68-4491-A965-C1B97D1D86C1 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20150712213152 DOT 7968b74c AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <304D9D86-3CF6-4D61-A5CA-6CE414EA0661 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20150712224637 DOT 2d4cc2de AT wind DOT levalinux DOT org> <55A2E9B7 DOT 9040502 AT neurotica DOT com> <CAM2RGhSmFhz9=oRaaj2EDL79c5XVmeuwmX_RdLqMv0evEHCyTw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CACwWb3DbmOZbtb9Hrp2JvvG7-toryXuequQA=YV7X6ss762zsw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150713131707 DOT GA782 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov> <CAM2RGhTT__nWCkA4y36rb24yT8xP=o1nR04H=DNqTJiu=naSGA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <55A4042E DOT 5060402 AT neurotica DOT com> <CAM2RGhS=5xq0_oN4e0M55Kor4bcnXNn3NfLvRZoi7Vw9Aq1ZXg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <55A41B30 DOT 50602 AT neurotica DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507151114560 DOT 2113 AT nimbus> <254F9AFE-1A3E-4D88-BABF-E6E0F87A56B1 AT icloud DOT com> <1436960577 DOT 1072 DOT 6 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <EE9F72D6-E17A-4F5C-8E9E-45F12C901C9F AT noqsi DOT com> <201507151820 DOT t6FIKYME001704 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <46010EEB-8968-4635-9F1B-F4AE8147F24A!
 ! @noqsi.com> <201507152007 DOT t6FK7lv8005229 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <24AD56C6-B7C2-4D7E-B69A-F68DBACCBFDC AT noqsi DOT com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


My point was, there was no need to bring up every single possibility
in a question specifically about gschem/pcb.  Doing so both distracts
people from answering the original question, and artificially raises
the bar to solving it.  We don't need to solve every problem every
time.  We *do* need to start solving some of the problems some of the
time.  *If* a solution comes up and *if* it can be used for other
purposes and *if* you want to do the work to make it more general,
*that* is the time to bring it up.  Throwing "it must be perfect and
do everything" in people's faces when they suggest things, only makes
them no longer want to suggest things.

Perfect is the enemy of Good Enough, and your constant pestering about
perfection has made you the enemy.