X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From: Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Subject: Re: developer excitement? was Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 03:45:11 +0200
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <mo1pj8$pdf$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <CAM2RGhTpfbqM7zNn72TBOjeL7B7LPT1PxSEU3+9aDdChFrPFTg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1436400557 DOT 676 DOT 46 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <mnv2jl$699$2 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <201507130239 DOT t6D2dkoO011392 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a89-182-147-107.net-htp.de
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.1
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

DJ Delorie wrote:

>> Geda developers did not bother to respond when CERN people looked
>> for asked on this list looking for partners. Consequently, CERN
>> decided to cooperate with kicad.
> 
> Actually, we did talk with CERN and hoped they would partner with
> us, but they chose Kicad instead.
> 
Well, the above is what stuck in my long time memory from this post:
	http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cad.geda.user/38924/focus=38952
Skipping through the thread, nobody seemed to have disagreed at the time.

---<)kaimartin(>---