X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on fly.srk.fer.hr
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=6.3 tests=ALL_TRUSTED
	autolearn=disabled version=3.4.0
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 23:23:35 +0200
From: "Ivan Stankovic (pokemon AT fly DOT srk DOT fer DOT hr) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: "Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] PCB interface (ECAD vs. MCAD)
Message-ID: <20150713212335.GA3431@alpha2>
References: <1670171546 DOT 913210 DOT 1436776811789 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
 <79456AAA-24A9-4300-900D-005ABBCFCBDA AT icloud DOT com>
 <CAOP4iL0dWqVnAXRSfYKRW4BknJ5WK5oFceSg7TWcb3m57oUesA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <1436801138 DOT 685 DOT 9 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
 <55A403B4 DOT 1050505 AT neurotica DOT com>
 <1436814649 DOT 685 DOT 45 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507132133370 DOT 26077 AT nimbus>
 <20150713221152 DOT 13a4cd47 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
 <CAM2RGhR5XhS3z-M5VhHnVLoJ9Uobk8zJnkNp9kQFV_rvHbkftg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <55A422D2 DOT 50602 AT neurotica DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55A422D2.50602@neurotica.com>
X-Operating-System: GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23+89 (0255b37be491) (2014-03-12)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 04:42:58PM -0400, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> On 07/13/2015 04:28 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >>> Sorry, I'll have to back Dave here.  There is always a certain amount
> >>> of GTK vs. Qt vs. something else debate, but I personally don't have
> >>> the impression that there is any tendency in favor of Qt.
> >>
> >> There is. There are a bunch of Linux developers, including Linus, who are fed
> >> up with the attitude of GTK / Gnome and systemd developers.
> > 
> > I can't stand systemd and I don't like GNOME3. That said we don't have
> > the time to change right now. Let the sands shift more while we fix
> > geda and pcb so that when we have our house in order the migration off
> > gtk2 can be smoother (if we do indeed decided to migrate)
> 
>   I agree with your opinion of systemd, FWIW.  It's a steaming pile, and
> a VERY bad idea from the get-go.

While I share the attitude toward systemd expressed so far,
please, everyone, do not introduce yet another, highly flammable
topic into this thread.  God knows we have too many of those
already.  :-)

-- 
Ivan Stankovic, pokemon AT fly DOT srk DOT fer DOT hr

"Protect your digital freedom and privacy, eliminate DRM, 
learn more at http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm"