X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=B9+bEiH02dFalLCx0xwWzJsKn1zT1bc0/GfAICsKUIk=; b=OmQVPViAiGhwuYshQw8+c4JuLvzs/mucPN8qfT8IpI/KOOJ8JwWNJkqfFkBBhgQrl9 jwtiz2mgb+aQvLbdjE066D+oX/VZLK2qAXgSehcKGVD5/ZP6mTudR21LH0KDlGVvLOtF LKj2HxKXw2xKx5TwkwXU5cjNBdJG+R+a2+AxXHeHbINWNp9BYxb0oYh3TyyQ7dysyjcs mCpHBCFxQYMFkPxr11Q9w8cAVY6Y/yNiDHhLI8vVnHCrRnqPsjVcl6FKcPjxjPe6ig9F hmAd9Hfk7Cgye5cNEYwXw4lMVCLdEn5WEycINlFz3rOGOF8+9XWeJ7sOW1IVmTiKjge+ /3ng== X-Received: by 10.152.234.200 with SMTP id ug8mr33546825lac.63.1436822364965; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 00:19:22 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] The new to do Message-ID: <20150713211922.GE8712@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20150712224637 DOT 2d4cc2de AT wind DOT levalinux DOT org> <55A2E9B7 DOT 9040502 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150713131707 DOT GA782 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov> <55A4042E DOT 5060402 AT neurotica DOT com> <55A41115 DOT 2060607 AT xs4all DOT nl> <55A419C5 DOT 6080206 AT neurotica DOT com> <55A421F0 DOT 8000208 AT xs4all DOT nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55A421F0.8000208@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:39:12PM +0200, Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > All I can do (or did) is push an upgrade for a Dutch or Portugese > translation file to the main pcb repo every now and then, correct a typo > here and there ;-) Your work (as well as Gareth's one, and both Peter's, DJ's and others) always inspires me to work further. > > I did create a lot of topic branches with patches from Launchpad, on my > github sandbox repo (1), as to keep them useful by fast-forwarding (git > rebase) and removing bitrot every now and then. > > It's just that I need someone to give me advice/direction between what is an > improvement (good patch --> push this one) or what is not in line with > future goals (bad patch --> do not push that one). > > If there is a "broad consensus" I can merge the good ones into "master" and > push, all by popular demand from users and devs. I believe the best you can do is to merge your branches into master. Don't wait for a "broad consensus". You're on your own. If someone will find something wrong, we'll learn this from feedback. Cheers, Vladimir