X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:06:37 -0400
Message-Id: <201507132106.t6DL6btb018908@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <20150713205844.GD8712@localhost.localdomain>
	(geda-user AT delorie DOT com)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Re: The new to do
References: <CAM2RGhQ70Pex5aNeQ86vKHc7sKf_Vpws69__CPb2QKg6fJTeHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <CAM2RGhQ_RfN4x=s7BBy_3T8tfe4aNER-FRBOV_9wbo=90eMcbQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <55A41CB5 DOT 1010604 AT xs4all DOT nl> <20150713205844 DOT GD8712 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Just push it, and don't wait for the "broad consensus". If something
> is wrong, there's already a chance to fix it afterwards.

I agree.  The risk/reward of having to revert a patch is better than
the risk/reward of bitrotting a patch.