X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-No-IP: dbtgroup DOT com AT noip-smtp X-Report-Spam-To: abuse AT no-ip DOT com Message-ID: <55A41F07.9070709@dbtgroup.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:26:47 -0700 From: "Yvette S. Hirth, CCP, CDP (yvette AT dbtgroup DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" Organization: The DBT Group, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] PCB interface (ECAD vs. MCAD) References: <76520AC3-3E8D-4F80-A912-AB076DD8D0C6 AT icloud DOT com> <1670171546 DOT 913210 DOT 1436776811789 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <79456AAA-24A9-4300-900D-005ABBCFCBDA AT icloud DOT com> <1436801138 DOT 685 DOT 9 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <55A403B4 DOT 1050505 AT neurotica DOT com> <1436814649 DOT 685 DOT 45 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <55A4197E DOT 8060700 AT neurotica DOT com> In-Reply-To: <55A4197E.8060700@neurotica.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 07/13/2015 01:03 PM, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > I know Qt licensing used to be a hassle; has that situation improved? not imo. i paid for a perpetual license of QT Commercial; the maint expired, and now they tell me i have to pay "monthly subscription fees" as my license "is no longer usable". so much for "perpetual"... so i'm not sure whether or not i'll use QT in the future. i don't do this to my clients, so why should i go along with their (imo bogus) "licensing" plan? if GTK2 touchscreen support was "right here right now", i'd probably use GTK2. afaict, in all GTK(x) releases, touchscreens aren't really supported - please lmk if i'm missing something here. thanks yvette