X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at neurotica.com X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore: I do not consent to surveillance, prick X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com; s=default; t=1436817791; bh=2ku8xW952Xwboz97cGhQjDIoekbTUoSw7yejCLiQ7FM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Vw0oTyj9WcbiropUGs11eXNVGM1Qk0JgXQ+by138EXpcy0b45FZG+Xx2dlnPBdJTS IcRZCdpAmaak8Hyqtgn9s5CsWhDM8HqYBgyT0d/xHARURZkL2f696tvw1xjiNRz5cu pfG6P3/q20kMPxHbjaTVMfOJ9kuTJU2pmrNjYlnM= Message-ID: <55A4197E.8060700@neurotica.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 16:03:10 -0400 From: "Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] PCB interface (ECAD vs. MCAD) References: <76520AC3-3E8D-4F80-A912-AB076DD8D0C6 AT icloud DOT com> <1670171546 DOT 913210 DOT 1436776811789 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> <79456AAA-24A9-4300-900D-005ABBCFCBDA AT icloud DOT com> <1436801138 DOT 685 DOT 9 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <55A403B4 DOT 1050505 AT neurotica DOT com> <1436814649 DOT 685 DOT 45 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> In-Reply-To: <1436814649.685.45.camel@ssalewski.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t6DK3KrO020795 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 07/13/2015 03:10 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote: >>> Indeed five years ago I started with some Cairo drawing on a GTK drawing >>> area for fun -- later that evolves to my gschem clone. But at that time >>> I was not aware how unpopular GTK now is. >> >> Just for the record, I've never gotten the impression (except for >> here, just in this set of threads) that GTK is unpopular. > > So I really recommend never using a google search term as "GTK vs Qt" or > similar :-) > > For example this, but you can find much more > > http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/2dxik3/future_of_gnome_and_gtk_when_whole_world_is/ > > > Some search results may be silly, but there is unfortunately a very > clear tendency. And many developers have migrated their software from > GTK to Qt in the last years, no one in the other direction. I already > said that for myself GTK3 on my Linux box is still fine -- one problem > is, that their is no community left. One single core developer seems to > be still subscribed to main GTK mailing list! Documentation of GTK3 is > really not bad, but asking someone when one has problems is really a > problem. Indeed getting a fine answer is the problem. For the bad look > and feel on Mac and Windows -- I heard that everywhere. I am not fully > convinced that it looks so bad, saw some screenshots which I considered > OK, but maybe not really native look. At least I have to admit that > Gnome/GTK developers do not care much about Windows and Mac, for long > time only GTK 3.6.4 was available prebuild for Windows, while we had > already 3.14 for Linux. Another problem of GTK is of course the inner > structure with gobject, it is difficult and no new developer will ever > want to work on internal code. But that is only relevant for the few > remaining core developers. For me one big advantage of GTK is that its > plain C API makes it so easy to use it from many other programming > languages. For Qt with its MOC that is really a problem. That is pretty scary, and a bit surprising; I learned something interesting today. I know Qt licensing used to be a hassle; has that situation improved? One change I've noticed in Qt over the past few years is that applications seem to be much faster now. Early Qt stuff ran like lumbering bloated pigs, presumably due to bad C++ code. Now, in QUCS for example, things are lightning fast. -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA