X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=N8x3tvEKeXavrBAMEpKd9Fqi5+5IIOm48BX+30sTvGc=;
        b=WsRzRdJoqCsryytu//iB1z6oVo5gj2DQM6XCFvvE+6xODsxW18TRm4FzDAl0ralill
         pn7Zn8e4Yj859SLAcCTABIXrS0hhvtrj+3FXl0XUgpXb854R+moBwcPBwaJU/J9Nkq3a
         +Q0DrgkS7MMDuKSdhfOVlVz461tYkRUmiBZx4uP7tGtoNQLXbAn6hseM7r5C7r3Oqtwy
         /U+yccMv1wa0A4r8dI0VvCiRciklgZAV+RBZKw4OEcl8eGONNvp3qi21JNM0HxDqrlav
         /UYaqb4PpZqslgbDU7J7qYqc3gZk+/R0DirUWXRKhyyzhJ7Qtr1egriEe0FcvJmt46He
         ifaQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.7.206 with SMTP id l14mr33712699laa.3.1436816693020;
 Mon, 13 Jul 2015 12:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150713191712.17fde450@jive.levalinux.org>
References: <CAM2RGhQ70Pex5aNeQ86vKHc7sKf_Vpws69__CPb2QKg6fJTeHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55A2A0A2 DOT 4080403 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<7AE39440-DA68-4491-A965-C1B97D1D86C1 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<20150712213152 DOT 7968b74c AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<304D9D86-3CF6-4D61-A5CA-6CE414EA0661 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<20150712224637 DOT 2d4cc2de AT wind DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<55A2E9B7 DOT 9040502 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhSmFhz9=oRaaj2EDL79c5XVmeuwmX_RdLqMv0evEHCyTw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CACwWb3DbmOZbtb9Hrp2JvvG7-toryXuequQA=YV7X6ss762zsw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150713131707 DOT GA782 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov>
	<CAM2RGhTT__nWCkA4y36rb24yT8xP=o1nR04H=DNqTJiu=naSGA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<7085C620-769C-432B-97B1-931120BA455B AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<20150713191712 DOT 17fde450 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:44:52 -0400
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhTtQEEOkMTGKCu_ZM=vQgEgYkgOKZ0FzDvG=Frwj4bJDA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] The new to do
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Lev (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:33:21 -0700
> "Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]"
> <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> What about breaking the process into two steps? The first step
>> collects ideas only - no discussion or decision making. The second
>> step could entail a voting process on which features are most
>> important to the stakeholders.
>>
>> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dotmocracy
>
> We are engineers, and computer/software scientists. I prefer 'rough
> consensus'.
>
> I don't prefer voting.

I am going for rough consensus with a heavy hand from the people I see
as long term principles. My intention is to do some coding and
hopefully pull in more people.

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zRN7XLCRhc
>
> Lev
>
> --
> 73 de HA5OGL
> Op.: Levente
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/