X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:29:42 -0400 Message-Id: <201507131729.t6DHTgXw010904@envy.delorie.com> From: DJ Delorie To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <7085C620-769C-432B-97B1-931120BA455B@sbcglobal.net> (geda-user AT delorie DOT com) Subject: Re: [geda-user] The new to do References: <55A2A0A2 DOT 4080403 AT ecosensory DOT com> <7AE39440-DA68-4491-A965-C1B97D1D86C1 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20150712213152 DOT 7968b74c AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> <304D9D86-3CF6-4D61-A5CA-6CE414EA0661 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20150712224637 DOT 2d4cc2de AT wind DOT levalinux DOT org> <55A2E9B7 DOT 9040502 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150713131707 DOT GA782 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov> <7085C620-769C-432B-97B1-931120BA455B AT sbcglobal DOT net> Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > What about breaking the process into two steps? The first step > collects ideas only - no discussion or decision making. The second > step could entail a voting process on which features are most > important to the stakeholders. gEDA is a doitocracy. If you want something done, do it. If you want it done badly, convince others to help you do it. Voting just isn't going to work, because losing a vote doesn't make a developer want to work on the winning idea.