X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at papyrus.altaweb.hu
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:17:12 +0200
From: "Lev (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] The new to do
Message-ID: <20150713191712.17fde450@jive.levalinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <7085C620-769C-432B-97B1-931120BA455B@sbcglobal.net>
References: <CAM2RGhQ70Pex5aNeQ86vKHc7sKf_Vpws69__CPb2QKg6fJTeHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55A2A0A2 DOT 4080403 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<7AE39440-DA68-4491-A965-C1B97D1D86C1 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<20150712213152 DOT 7968b74c AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<304D9D86-3CF6-4D61-A5CA-6CE414EA0661 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<20150712224637 DOT 2d4cc2de AT wind DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<55A2E9B7 DOT 9040502 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhSmFhz9=oRaaj2EDL79c5XVmeuwmX_RdLqMv0evEHCyTw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CACwWb3DbmOZbtb9Hrp2JvvG7-toryXuequQA=YV7X6ss762zsw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150713131707 DOT GA782 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov>
	<CAM2RGhTT__nWCkA4y36rb24yT8xP=o1nR04H=DNqTJiu=naSGA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<7085C620-769C-432B-97B1-931120BA455B AT sbcglobal DOT net>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by delorie.com id t6DHHc3A006706
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:33:21 -0700
"Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]"
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> What about breaking the process into two steps? The first step
> collects ideas only - no discussion or decision making. The second
> step could entail a voting process on which features are most
> important to the stakeholders.
> 
> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dotmocracy

We are engineers, and computer/software scientists. I prefer 'rough
consensus'.

I don't prefer voting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zRN7XLCRhc

Lev

-- 
73 de HA5OGL
Op.: Levente