X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at av02.lsn.net Message-ID: <55A3DE3B.7070402@ecosensory.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:50:19 -0500 From: John Griessen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: developer excitement? was Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? References: <559EC0A4 DOT 9020401 AT ecosensory DOT com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 07/12/2015 07:42 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote: > I for one am happy with the distributed property of git. Fossil does that too -- each repo can be used to restart the whole project. It lacks the rebase function, favoring keeping all history, while allowing a delete here and there to get rid of an accidental commit of bug jpg file or such. Fossil has a unifying feature for a project like gEDA/PCB with a hand full of developers: Every branch of the project is available to all if they have a repo of the same name as the main project, unless someone cloned, checked out and then never did the update command. The built in website is another unifying feature for communication about the project state of development for a group of occasional programmers like us. Importing from git is easy, so switching would not be a big expense of time. The command set is much easier to use by an occasional programmer... http://stevebennett.me/2012/02/24/10-things-i-hate-about-git/