X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.14.151,1.0.33,0.0.0000 definitions=2015-07-13_06:2015-07-11,2015-07-13,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=5 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1412110000 definitions=main-1507130120 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] PCB interface (ECAD vs. MCAD) From: "Chris Smith (space DOT dandy AT icloud DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" In-reply-to: <1670171546.913210.1436776811789.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:01:31 +0100 Message-id: <79456AAA-24A9-4300-900D-005ABBCFCBDA@icloud.com> References: <76520AC3-3E8D-4F80-A912-AB076DD8D0C6 AT icloud DOT com> <1670171546 DOT 913210 DOT 1436776811789 DOT JavaMail DOT yahoo AT mail DOT yahoo DOT com> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t6D91f9F030500 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > On 13 Jul 2015, at 09:40, Cirilo Bernardo (cirilo_bernardo AT yahoo DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > Now generally these > days if you say "MCAD" you're talking about 3D solid model design > software; if you're doing 2D stuff that's simply drafting software > and not necessarily MCAD although no one will dispute that it's > CAD. That’s what I meant. I was thinking purely of 2D geometry. > Otherwise the only significant feature I can think of which is > shared by ECAD and MCAD is the 2D geometry code needed to create > outlines/cutouts/fills in the PCB design phase. I guess MCAD > would also do clearance checks so you could script it to do > DRC on 3D models of tracks if you really wanted to do things the > hard way. That’s my point. If you ignore the modern 3D MCAD stuff and look at a simple 2D draughting package, like QCad, then PCB layout is just that plus electrical semantics — relationships between objects and layers. Regards, Chris — Chris Smith