X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <55A2D820.10401@wavecable.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:12:00 -0700
From: "Thomas D. Dean (tomdean AT wavecable DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] The new to do
References: <CAM2RGhQ70Pex5aNeQ86vKHc7sKf_Vpws69__CPb2QKg6fJTeHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<55A2A0A2 DOT 4080403 AT ecosensory DOT com>	<7AE39440-DA68-4491-A965-C1B97D1D86C1 AT sbcglobal DOT net>	<20150712213152 DOT 7968b74c AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>	<304D9D86-3CF6-4D61-A5CA-6CE414EA0661 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20150712224637 DOT 2d4cc2de AT wind DOT levalinux DOT org>
In-Reply-To: <20150712224637.2d4cc2de@wind.levalinux.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 07/12/15 13:46, Kovacs Levente (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 13:21:32 -0700
> "Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> What are the alternatives? Stay on Gtk+ 2 or Qt?
>
> Why do we want change something, which is not broken? Do we have some issues
> with GTK2? I don't think so. GTK3 is ugly. Why do we talk about it?
>
> If we must change, then change to QT.
>
> I think GTK2 is okay. There are a tons of other things to do with gEDA.

gEDA, at least gschem works very good as is.

Not QT.  On some (many?) Ubuntu platforms, QT is semi-broken, at least 
when used with gnuplot.

Tom Dean