X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at neurotica.com X-NSA-prism-xkeyscore: I do not consent to surveillance, prick X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neurotica.com; s=default; t=1436730419; bh=Dyvx1jN6YeGUNHnQKQnW80XlUhqj6OTeevhKnGeENLQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=d7/ShfrRbt9yZz13le1OLR6PqosxYQb8kbQM4XCi+dqHswpdlrrkKr2rYNn6wju+V MvgmQua3ExdanrJj8I+P0djsXHgUjjVx5CCL5tMZVWjMK/n/7wOV+Z38FGzyAkLvwd Yo7KIcZy+yg2OLUWNL8hjH6INGwVZTsIwm5CWIFk= Message-ID: <55A2C432.8040306@neurotica.com> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 15:46:58 -0400 From: "Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: developer excitement? was Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? References: <55A229D3 DOT 3080501 AT zoot DOT drehmel DOT com> <55A29426 DOT 8080908 AT xs4all DOT nl> <55A2BD85 DOT 9000004 AT sbcglobal DOT net> In-Reply-To: <55A2BD85.9000004@sbcglobal.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 07/12/2015 03:18 PM, Girvin R. Herr (gherr375 AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > The lack of the geda-dev list explains why all of a sudden this past > week, I, who only subscribe to the geda-user list, have been deluged > with "this developer stuff" (~200 messages in 2 days). This is remotely > interesting to me, but it gets deleted. I would think that a newbie > user who visits this list, would be turned off by all the > techno-babble. What happened to the geda-dev list? That's ludicrous. Why would someone who would be "turned off by techno-babble" be interested in schematic capture and PCB routing software? -Dave -- Dave McGuire, AK4HZ New Kensington, PA