X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at av01.lsn.net Message-ID: <559FFA44.2060106@ecosensory.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:00:52 -0500 From: John Griessen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] why I parse sch: gnetlist, writing backends (Back annotation) References: <559E86A4 DOT 3040109 AT ecosensory DOT com> <201507091843 DOT t69IhGF6028321 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <6392CE1A-AFA0-4D62-979C-3F35786422BD AT noqsi DOT com> <201507092127 DOT t69LRHRC001744 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <559EFE69 DOT 1040601 AT zoot DOT drehmel DOT com> <201507092332 DOT t69NWUEN006109 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150710132650 DOT GA15876 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150710152517 DOT GB17023 AT localhost DOT localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20150710152517.GB17023@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com On 07/10/2015 10:25 AM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > I'm certain the gnetlist core would be better to > rewrite in scheme using one common libgeda interface. +1