X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=/HEzI90wUzTodvEYHLAePmxKVhb/at3EE78l/RlevlE=; b=M7+tq1pp7eQl/kNSbA11c4JyfWxVg3BN7Pr3j+ICHjPR/gENuSgATYdX4ALQvVVhvC RUM6i2f1/GSCz/ZhCsuMJJwkfOBqETSBRpIlIFavbeWW0VEAl0hnQLu0YYUyElr+YeYK kRYYkSQ3b1xUVAoJpTuZd7wMfbhtP0NUZB2srqFVRBC3KU4SHSjGSq477J9toUtZrLGP DvBAuGv96sI1vSwh1IKSEsEvgqlk5FgOhtMR7rePx036y0ZYhJSKrGZf4m6g9+UvIlWz xbN96IQDTdQukagEK4Q49bxvnczFdGxscHWtPFq/szIMxAclM/K9Ar1nWefXmjoDZ1/8 yaEw== X-Received: by 10.112.137.1 with SMTP id qe1mr20345380lbb.22.1436546750349; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:45:47 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] why I parse sch: gnetlist, writing backends (Back annotation) Message-ID: <20150710164547.GB23736@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <201507091843 DOT t69IhGF6028321 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <6392CE1A-AFA0-4D62-979C-3F35786422BD AT noqsi DOT com> <201507092127 DOT t69LRHRC001744 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <559EFE69 DOT 1040601 AT zoot DOT drehmel DOT com> <201507092332 DOT t69NWUEN006109 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150710132650 DOT GA15876 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150710152308 DOT GA17023 AT localhost DOT localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 06:19:01PM +0200, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: ... > Btw, it was you who TL;DR'd. One part of my story was right about trying to > extract attributes and netlist stuff with gnetlist That was the part that > took incredibly long due to scheme. In turn this experience made me not even > consider using it again for the other task which was coord extraction. OK, sorry, I was a bit rough. > So next time I have something similar to solve, I will first ask you for the > scheme code and only if that fails I do the dirty sch-parsing awk fewliner. Agreed. Don't ask me for rocket science, though. Those questions are for John and Dave :) Cheers, Vladimir