X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=PDDeCrVmF9ZaCvxS/TqAOLfAFgEqfXHn+j+ZshcdhQA=; b=Hm2eSFjXnsW9o7a8rUr6GvFNoO6UqWenUIKW1b4hJqYbXTPQUJdzxx4WRaHq8E72IE ZPlDBmBdxUhEQQNiaXAzqmtt1EkeRQa5fNcD9SksV2NAJ2e7CfN3ZebD6g5T095VldCM ND1nyz1wFgO1GFx8/8WwFjeP+ZSvSzi/nAPeC37ShUbH+tcq+C64WCicken3htQ8bo6M yy40Ir+USdAQZ9JP9Qb1dQ26eX/Vo6qvBJgvGV8855+bA3cvOkkwOGsjeEWtMazvBWDp +BAlqyJ+hpNSo5ZoQXYVb86mkzGcKtCKmAcKfBRRfNe8QjQ9zGJpKLaTUEkytaY84Oo7 /Fcw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.164.35 with SMTP id yn3mr19881581lbb.91.1436539194149; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 07:39:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150710081049.GA13669@localhost.localdomain> References: <559EFCF0 DOT 5040007 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150710081049 DOT GA13669 AT localhost DOT localdomain> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 10:39:54 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: patch testing, was Re: [geda-user] Repository Management was Re: developer excitement? From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:10 AM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 07:00:00PM -0400, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> On 07/09/2015 06:35 PM, Svenn Are Bjerkem (svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com) >> [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> > What is a good way to test out patches without having to garble up a >> > clean install of the released geda? Try it out on a separate computer or >> > a virtualbox? >> >> Oh good heavens no. Just use a different --prefix on your ./configure >> command line. > > This doesn't solve the problem if you want a clean environment. > Your config files would be still used. How much danger are people really in from a testing version of gEDA? Are you guys worried about malware hiding in it or something? > I'd support the chroot solution already proposed here. It's pretty > simple and convenient. > > Cheers, > Vladimir -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/