X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=lZzqp9KcFq52ThjekGfQlSdP96Uk+JaIC5I3Vu4fFmw=; b=j6SDHtddHEO6gQ4bPn6H16sYVh790PORwLAxx46rrZHT2ye/DCbG2sBaWweoT31Roh hkRSe9ovccecF+bPMby5z64llKZ2KaMFDOIceAYeJkk/tcH2PhkFqUhcVvKb6aZvpoNq gjZHBjBjdJ94b+jkjZzNLTE89E0B+9rbkKv8JbSwhNAjGryo86HO6TNIxspsDopSsuz1 nnMsiNw1Njzx3cZcJViHtoRb7lNC5CV6+JElG86ktGi938ZgPJ3yKKnDph32BiY/NzIV fPHdSkRnFe/nJ/zuUaQsVPsJ9WkHojDEgzlew/2z2Yad0IMUsmIT2OYN6EaxvaOA8T70 n5cA== X-Received: by 10.152.170.234 with SMTP id ap10mr18906596lac.28.1436515852100; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 01:10:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:10:49 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: patch testing, was Re: [geda-user] Repository Management was Re: developer excitement? Message-ID: <20150710081049.GA13669@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <559EFCF0 DOT 5040007 AT neurotica DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <559EFCF0.5040007@neurotica.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 07:00:00PM -0400, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On 07/09/2015 06:35 PM, Svenn Are Bjerkem (svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com) > [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > What is a good way to test out patches without having to garble up a > > clean install of the released geda? Try it out on a separate computer or > > a virtualbox? > > Oh good heavens no. Just use a different --prefix on your ./configure > command line. This doesn't solve the problem if you want a clean environment. Your config files would be still used. I'd support the chroot solution already proposed here. It's pretty simple and convenient. Cheers, Vladimir