X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at av02.lsn.net
Message-ID: <559EC0A4.9020401@ecosensory.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:42:44 -0500
From: John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: developer excitement? was Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
References: <CAM2RGhTpfbqM7zNn72TBOjeL7B7LPT1PxSEU3+9aDdChFrPFTg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507090507530 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <CAC4O8c_9mvUW6ub2EWCs2boucLdnzj5O_xCsaCNEaT17brLe0g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507091922140 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1507091922140.6924@igor2priv>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 07/09/2015 12:33 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>> This is certainly true of gEDA but not because of DVCS.
>
> Your view. Mine is switching from DVCS to a centralized one would be the first step to clean up the mess. We probably won't ever
> agree on this, and I accept this; and do you?


  I think Fossil would be a god central VCS for this project.  It's developed by the sqlite folks, so it must be reliable,
goes the reasoning.