X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Back annotation From: John Doty In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 11:53:27 -0600 Message-Id: <79A9781F-7F48-4B28-8809-F902DE9C7273@noqsi.com> References: <559E86A4 DOT 3040109 AT ecosensory DOT com> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t69HrXor010471 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Jul 9, 2015, at 11:16 AM, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> For my ASIC designs, the parameter extracted netlists are about 200x the size of the netlists generated from the schematics. Printed circuit designs are generally flatter, but back-annotation into even a simple circuit still looks impractical to me. There’s really no utility to it anyway: the netlist is what you need as input for your verification process. > > Since you don't do layout work, how would you know? Because I’ve done the verification. > > Britton > > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com