X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xFgdgtSD2Mq9Au4FijRe7zPJv/iMVdg8tBREJFUMclQ=; b=E9KEf+XcbasrDBukWFJevabuz0G7bWAg8I8JbGfJpQJ0CqfEzihrRUy2eRATr/qUIP RbnjoZxgp4TjFYlndBnMoejshrAaeHEV2anDB9MHbWr8YV16NH1EQrjK4FhbWwilxQOJ Hki3zWK9uMae+UljypebII/JCwnZ9mCs62qgP4J8sa1Ht0ZvEtfxkh8uVKFo9PAM6ELp Y9ywxuvu/jEBmViOS4FJ/iz6QR9XLwYHjZ826UbZ0Y7JeesCrEvjvf8TKWD3vRD4M1oP 62rHcfd8FsnruVAfMBEhwfLxic9f4wdX6pulu0QqEqzHhwe5mJKfdR15p0wvn8PxfH/v v/2g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.89.5 with SMTP id bk5mr33393909wjb.144.1436462192647; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:16:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <559E86A4 DOT 3040109 AT ecosensory DOT com> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 09:16:32 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] Back annotation From: "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t69HGae3007017 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > For my ASIC designs, the parameter extracted netlists are about 200x the size of the netlists generated from the schematics. Printed circuit designs are generally flatter, but back-annotation into even a simple circuit still looks impractical to me. There’s really no utility to it anyway: the netlist is what you need as input for your verification process. Since you don't do layout work, how would you know? Britton