X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=npEciSCJ5f8SLnIpHKQqiLWUCsdU8KJuodqi4rrbMjk=;
        b=O6Qa/3wfGUaGT2gtqMLm70HFkXgnTuykA1KzBQ9UD5FrFmYF3sW6d1aonRuiCV6pSN
         p6Ku1+NxLhgZyNAcH7wmW9PyoweR77Dhq3lj2Pg7KDTP9QduesULvV7cYLu/gE2d+biO
         al1SAyYReXFnSkHT0nnNYyJt25EU3tO7rpgDGswDRA17EwgdPywbWJx8sRS7wOUUqkqO
         IZkGEC3876UvJ6shsM6oYAJAmXDKuSnkf3TKjLpRifnCf/OvrLHCmtailGlSoYUoNd8w
         9arUlqZisxrflm5u9MxqJMkjlUYeGRvNGW7aD6D497neIh7IdM0vC8NuhgGnVoIiZJQS
         8XiA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.7.206 with SMTP id l14mr15338049laa.3.1436455889151;
 Thu, 09 Jul 2015 08:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <559E88C0.8070209@ecosensory.com>
References: <CAM2RGhTpfbqM7zNn72TBOjeL7B7LPT1PxSEU3+9aDdChFrPFTg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507090507530 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507091329350 DOT 3444 AT nimbus>
	<559E86A4 DOT 3040109 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<559E88C0 DOT 8070209 AT ecosensory DOT com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 11:31:29 -0400
Message-ID: <CAM2RGhRDHqhjHTtYTNHB_9oQj0djnYO8sGA63yKG7hg-emNOwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Back annotation (was: developer excitement?)
From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

What if instead of ratlines it just adds a 2 or 3 block long (unsure
of units) line and assigns it a netname?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:44 AM, John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com> wrote:
> On 07/09/2015 09:35 AM, John Griessen wrote:
>>
>> Missing components
>> would add to a "reverse rat list" of schematic symbols needing addition.
>
>
> Showing a diff with addition differences and subtraction differences is
> plenty.
> The diff would need to show symbols needed easily -- those symbol names
> would come from a proper annotation of the layout.
>
> GUI for that might be red highlighting for saying to delete something,
> and greenish or whatever color for "reverse-rat-lines" of what needs adding.



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/