X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 17:32:56 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender: igor2 AT igor2priv
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Debug: to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From: gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject: Re: [geda-user] Back annotation (was: developer excitement?)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1507091601150.1892@nimbus>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1507091731510.6924@igor2priv>
References: <CAM2RGhTpfbqM7zNn72TBOjeL7B7LPT1PxSEU3+9aDdChFrPFTg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507090507530 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507091329350 DOT 3444 AT nimbus> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507091404410 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <44FED82A-8277-427B-87A8-FBC5E9A3D0E5 AT noqsi DOT com>
 <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507091601150 DOT 1892 AT nimbus>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Roland Lutz wrote:

> On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, John Doty wrote:
>> If you?re just making changes until a diff shows nothing, it doesn?t matter 
>> whether you make them upstream or downstream. Just quit when you have a 
>> match!
>
> This sounds reasonable to me.  So the common denominator is to load a "target

Btw, are you going to implement it? Asking out of pure pessimism (I have 
seen such threads a lot without the code happening afterwards).