X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] Back annotation (was: developer excitement?) From: John Doty In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 07:40:20 -0600 Message-Id: <44FED82A-8277-427B-87A8-FBC5E9A3D0E5@noqsi.com> References: To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t69DeTs7018909 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk An afterthought: On Jul 9, 2015, at 6:15 AM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote: > There are the usual corner cases when two applications/threads/authors want to make modification on the same thing, e.g. what happens if i have a (pcb-gschem-wise) consistent design and then I change the same pinout in two different ways in the same time in PCB and in gschem and then do a forward annotation and a back annotation... But I think these could beworked around. If you’re just making changes until a diff shows nothing, it doesn’t matter whether you make them upstream or downstream. Just quit when you have a match! John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com