X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID: <20150708230514.31966.qmail@stuge.se>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 01:05:14 +0200
From: "Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: developer excitement? was Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still
	alive?
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <CAM2RGhTpfbqM7zNn72TBOjeL7B7LPT1PxSEU3+9aDdChFrPFTg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201507082208 DOT t68M89eQ016621 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <CAM2RGhRpH2gGYVC-bZ8XsX5xwb27R+6RdaR78O3addr-LuZbkw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAM2RGhRpH2gGYVC-bZ8XsX5xwb27R+6RdaR78O3addr-LuZbkw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> I am trying to find a way to bring back the higher level of engagement

I think the best course of action is that you work on what engages
you. Anything else will not likely engage anyone else.


//Peter