X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at av01.lsn.net
Message-ID: <559D3E22.1090808@ecosensory.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 10:13:38 -0500
From: John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>	<20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>	<CAFC5WMoa2-z6bNca_bQN+jmMR260UBmoJQybUzH=L2TrBpzNNA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<1436006726 DOT 677 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>	<20150706200609 DOT GD24178 AT localhost DOT localdomain>	<CAC4O8c9f0pLsLu_dyuO5ggh7RmHY1vAA=UUhk9AE0JYZb4mhBQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<CAM2RGhQfPO31-1Uyc3kC7w286r0VD7c41UZEZcyYquzknCxbsQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<20150707060409 DOT GB14357 AT localhost DOT localdomain>	<CAOP4iL2C_LU=RQy5FWYF-7RrHW6tqhqqyFJGjkwLQ2AD7FiYJA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>	<1436287952 DOT 678 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>	<559C0F7E DOT 7010009 AT neurotica DOT com>	<1436295556 DOT 678 DOT 91 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <CAOuGh89C71vTW00QLQgVBAQy=m6Me8khjqep=eFH7KgKGqaSzw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOuGh89C71vTW00QLQgVBAQy=m6Me8khjqep=eFH7KgKGqaSzw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 07/07/2015 02:50 PM, Bob Paddock (graceindustries AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Functional Languages are the long term future rather than procedural
> languages for maintainability and keeping out bugs.

The nature of circuits is they need many parallel constraints satisfied, so functional/parallel-processing
oriented languages are going to be best. And then, there's documentation and bugs...