X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? From: John Doty In-Reply-To: <1436310569.678.169.camel@ssalewski.de> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 17:50:29 -0600 Message-Id: <13C9F448-9022-4AE2-9BF2-28220B6E75F1@noqsi.com> References: <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <1436006726 DOT 677 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150706200609 DOT GD24178 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150707060409 DOT GB14357 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <1436287952 DOT 678 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <559C0F7E DOT 7010009 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150707183339 DOT GA1817 AT alpha2> <559C3667 DOT 7030402 AT neurotica DOT com> <1436305751 DOT 678 DOT 145 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <6F56FB28-1576-4B94-B7C4-B455B5C0A4CF AT noqsi DOT com> <1436310569 DOT 678 DOT 169 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t67NocWI024226 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Jul 7, 2015, at 5:09 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote: > Of course. Large parts of programming is thinking and learning API usage > of libraries. Learning and using one of the easy languages is not too > much effort compared to that. And yet the unfamiliarity of Scheme is seen as a barrier by many. > > Can you remember PSchem? I have still the link on my homepage: > https://github.com/PSchem/PSchem > > Was a gschem clone in Python, but seems that nobody contributed. I looked at it. It wasn't a finished gschem replacement, and I’m reasonably happy with gschem as is (there are a couple of fairly recent misfeatures I wish I could turn off, but they’re not serious). To me, schematic capture is in good shape. Schematic processing, although geda-gaf’s greatest strength, is still not where it could be. Roland’s effort is thus of more interest, although this xorn thing is a barrier to comprehension, maybe an unnecessary complication. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com