X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s2048; t=1436311702; bh=QjPXOnGOUPhA8Qw+Ob2g1jXEN7CG+ML6qoutmeZTlH0=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:From:Subject; b=OEN1DjjXw4EVfAiGZBSMMvm3jZsUMbv8bZP63DM6Id3Dr9KXbOoOVGY01Q7q4UIv16ai+OnN7TefyMr2nkIlw18CeMIMNmTITqDG0TosLZZodiaEvMiUw52++iDvzBQr1xNRI6hXi0xfxtBE6bSfbIQz6jaWdsxMQxYRZSOyzc+2MNBpPjiJsu7vdWjtrib96sPqDmuBHH1jsW3DwaKVcD2XFTB1jzNXg06XZsa+Q9RHPJjxqmSyfn171vSi+2lCGAqtl9QeBCe/in9wHyLzBgVSI8zQC3qvSF6FS1hv9lMCEkbhPSn6diS2p2CFUV74G0cAty4t85+7YwmEDsu4yw==
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 459433 DOT 19515 DOT bm AT smtp202 DOT mail DOT gq1 DOT yahoo DOT com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: kSix3iEVM1n_tQdY5xRbdiHv7tBwQfHzW4ubJ9R63JmMASc
 G91FvZRjgidOGyIm93yfTpW3MQwz1WVmYMXg_d6_j4ofrk_e8rGTT_NamTPI
 e_gh9dwWJMt6VymJjWaf8sMVkOI8yEip9mFnU3rS6je5ePWynYNU918Lfu0F
 KX5BiPqov.GutXk9rzRcEgGyil6of41R1Kn5VXYF5BE7BD5FobTR6et8jWli
 .GpcnwHQ3ClpxPMu5K3AWIaanMJENXU9J1SNQwRRwvdJgJ4YXkTHsmlv2gGl
 WLNdw41qV3gQFbMuIkQdjbhIb_seNNDeouRP0TvK8tf8o7FPK.qHPkRIcpHc
 X2gMZQkjtuY1Mf0My7lrf3abAq8N_GcjXGVCPdO.STm.aGe46sFPjFC95Psx
 bgenJ40LGOtkB_xYK4uiNZBm4H9JXvY7PHqNpMtgWr.3xZ_eA6JIo4_Eq.sM
 MhGf.satu_sNKCN_naI6O1JsFgUX6z..RGhwfXwPyTAJ9RnEIVWwoeIwSUIC
 EngEk02zQVfGv_qPpHLhcM6BMaf.Kl4PpACYUuYgNrKTovvckVao-
X-Yahoo-SMTP: b8jVkbOswBAqZ4BhECp7nxPJUfTGEnEGv_G4qgQeZMeAbA--
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From: "Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <20150707211811.GB2780@alpha2>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 16:28:21 -0700
Message-Id: <045B3361-8DF2-4E1F-B437-C770C29327E6@sbcglobal.net>
References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <CAM2RGhSb=z35RYaJQmh-S4N73ng9WOj4ySmy_05J-7KGdBv8SA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAOP4iL3VBaS+bJhKJDk=_iuBSjDPY2-pvMdz5zPnf7A_rwD0Jw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150703191532 DOT GB21182 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507040542390 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <20150707160130 DOT GA18930 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <1FB0D727-9B89-4017-8FDE-7D9EEBE1589D AT sbcglobal DOT net> <20150707211811 DOT GB2780 AT alpha2>
To: "geda-user AT delorie DOT com" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t67NSS88022364
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> On Jul 7, 2015, at 2:18 PM, Ivan Stankovic (pokemon AT fly DOT srk DOT fer DOT hr) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 10:20:10AM -0700, Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> The likelihood that this thread, including the input from all the
>> developers and users, sets direction of the gEDA is slim. 
> 
> I completely agree.
> 
>> One developer either dives in and changes things, or goes somewhere else
>> and starts a new version. I'd like to see some process that resolves
>> the conflicting priorities of the community, can set direction, and
>> allow multiple developers to coordinate as a team.
> 
> I do not see the need to "resolve conflicting priorities".  It is not
> like somebody is going to prevent somebody from coding.  The code is out
> there.  Everyone can contribute and make an improvement.  Or a fork.
> 
> In my opinion, any effort that waits on the community consensus is
> doomed.

Agreed.

I believe a process could be adopted or contrived. For example, voting with dots could be used.

Using Scrum/Agile as a starting point would be better than what we have now. 

> The only approach that has a chance of success is to just
> do the work.  It's not like this is news.  I remember the moment
> the -dev list was isolated from the -user list, for exactly the
> same reason.

Having "heroic programmers" dive in and code everything indicates a problem to me. Not only do we lose programmers that only have a limited number of hours to dedicate to the project, heroic programmers tend to burn out and leave.

Cheers,
Ed