X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=G9HqdcI7FYzJr/IDpqu7MkvRZOzVhi4EiKPhNb9UURY=; b=tIfGgeYW4B1heVfDiVNrVtX2eJjzN9E2X1kd8tlIWs1mfACxqxJ18vk7u+ugcxZBli 9KUVaObRQzP8JJH1tHMXINCiXCKWiZkJzB/SDgd4kRdx5Xm4RbcBoiZXy8naItRQJiju fzYlb6wGQSrYbxES2/+59L+1pPpVeAgZ8K40snfUhtSR43plwirYLesq+hei6yUjoi4C fqR/RJEGeI/d2f+57HsQ9PsW02Ctzy7EsaPUC9U7gMWflO+EPaaxpGQEF2jAJR/W2GaW D1DbRzEiqFDdD4WEGmN0lN2J5iUYGE5kanKWp8yBhxSQbNhAp6fhJwvlEbmaiQuE7+KH iGOw== X-Received: by 10.112.140.137 with SMTP id rg9mr5816028lbb.101.1436303811881; Tue, 07 Jul 2015 14:16:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 00:16:49 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? Message-ID: <20150707211649.GE18930@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <1436006726 DOT 677 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150706200609 DOT GD24178 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150707060409 DOT GB14357 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <1436287952 DOT 678 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <559C0F7E DOT 7010009 AT neurotica DOT com> <20150707183339 DOT GA1817 AT alpha2> <559C3667 DOT 7030402 AT neurotica DOT com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <559C3667.7030402@neurotica.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:28:23PM -0400, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: ... > Somewhere along the line, I believe in the early 1970s, some idiot > proclaimed that "programmer time is more precious than processor time". > This created an excuse for programmer laziness that still affects us to > this day, giving us such "progress" as operating systems that require > gigabytes of RAM and several minutes at billions of clock cycles per > second just to boot. Every time Firefox slows to a crawl or Xilinx ISE > takes forever to start up, I'm reminded of this. It seems most people > just accept it, paint on it the pretty face of "progress" (at any cost!) > and pretend to like it. I think all this was intentional, as well as kettles and irons with modern 64-bit processors and some means for instant internet access. Cheers, Vladimir