X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Message-ID: <1436291983.678.53.camel@ssalewski.de> Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? From: Stefan Salewski To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 19:59:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1FB0D727-9B89-4017-8FDE-7D9EEBE1589D@sbcglobal.net> References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20150703191532 DOT GB21182 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150707160130 DOT GA18930 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <1FB0D727-9B89-4017-8FDE-7D9EEBE1589D AT sbcglobal DOT net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 10:20 -0700, Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > To increase the number of developers on the project, we would need to > find people interested in EDA, willing to contribute to open source, Yes, I have to admit that there is really not much hope. All FOSS development seems to have dried out in the last 10 years. Linux kernel contribution is now mainly by companies, not by independent people. GTK have very few developers left. For KiCad Mr Hollenbeck retired, and the remaining Kids seems to generate much noise, but do not contribute much value. Cern? I dont't know. Qucs? Maybe theory is too difficult. Fritzing? Have not heard much about it in the last years.