X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=PJidD6th/U7p9KanThQlYUkQ57RRNvp/2/UNWGRWoeg=; b=nJfa8b7x7+UbpEvgNRQRd77gBckdLI0EQHLT8Ed0UN1TflNnDHG7rLA+9lkNafdRiC CjWUdxu/sjBjq8YChWV8LJcgRBLsTFFZM4xuMbmHWxRcK9PuYKkb7bllCoB7GrGgLy5M uMzKxs4Lqp7tRi6gx49c5EqVkn1G4HDy1IKcTcp+s9iVK2EJjOudrV1w2d5nLJ0nS9Za U7qvqNmfAoRthrpyi6/w/ufGDpVL1NOzvce7ThrwcB0Fl2beFPH8TW4GCNgdJxtvAfVj VptQdroysUAyh582Ywqk6iVR+0yueeG2ZmBJDpNkQZdEM/KEhCySFUKHFNmBXkNNT0fy +XEw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.141.164 with SMTP id rp4mr80605629igb.2.1436291235854; Tue, 07 Jul 2015 10:47:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <1436006726 DOT 677 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150706200609 DOT GD24178 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150707060409 DOT GB14357 AT localhost DOT localdomain> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 10:47:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? From: "Ouabache Designworks (z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01295380e87116051a4c9c21 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk --089e01295380e87116051a4c9c21 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > > The Unix mentality these are all independent tools that we choose to > combined this way. Most people have avoided binding them via a > database because they want to keep things separate. > > Works great as long as the data in the pipes only flows in one direction. What do you do when you need to backannotate from one tool to another? John Eaton --089e01295380e87116051a4c9c21 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> = wrote:


The Unix mentality these are all independent tools that we choose to=
combined this way. Most people have avoided binding them via a
database because they want to keep things separate.


Works= great as long as the data in the pipes only flows in one direction. What d= o you do when you need to backannotate from one tool to another?

John Eaton


=C2=A0
--089e01295380e87116051a4c9c21--