X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=IjGdMlMLQm/T7lFc/epJvKukSyreA9BvXjb60jIkbZ4=; b=C9Bx+kGZ/yzalSQNEeINvSDu9p6iFIsWq4tb/eonb+jow/HLDFnA0Eew9iNNo31Ocq gYsCZJcLnKh3y2FTlkBGZQstFdiOw7svbAndxO/bMqkpqDObr6/UE13cq1ZgXhYSSOv5 yQb5kctXDpoxKvUUt7NURVMcZ4C69ZfBKra7agh9iYHsZUAZlVZqAAIUcmeiYMrMDH3M wjyheomIAsEophVBAQWkEmK/6RJTWAnvWzj3ZKgjaPfI7E+A0KBl3zi4HQUGE0YbfJoW ZZMXxQQrp94oE3li3DWN5vQeCvFkWyX+TbWLEw0j/gYDW2MVfSR52+0bFeQeNPY2+2De Qnng== X-Received: by 10.152.28.42 with SMTP id y10mr3350167lag.9.1436264287677; Tue, 07 Jul 2015 03:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 13:18:05 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] libgeda3 Message-ID: <20150707101805.GC15599@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20150704181229 DOT 9423 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 12:55:56PM +0200, Roland Lutz wrote: > On Sat, 4 Jul 2015, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >I might have miss read it but I got the impression it was a re-write in > >python. > > The storage backend (the "database" in Peter Brett's design document) which > makes sure object manipulations are "atomic" (though "value oriented" would > be more consistent with the philosophy here) is actually written from > scratch as a C library, but that's because nothing in gEDA provides > comparable functionality yet. > > Instead of having gEDA use libxornstorage directly (which I originally > intended), I decided to start by picking parts of gEDA and translating them > to Python, using libxornstorage through Python bindings, and refactoring > them in the process. gnetlist was an obvious candidate here as it's de > facto un-maintainable in its current state. I don't think so since I've been working on it. Cheers, Vladimir