X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=jtSh+SSoQdqH2/ZVajvkW42vMtiF4U3MXj9KGFG1pYE=; b=sAiYIvX25n0dvWMvkS5m6R5l6MWAX7SvnIDakVTI0N0Y0RqEyDVP09YMdPBklkgKuF lJVhWfqnOdGphc+ZvDhncx0jABE7yhzQO7Ur5jg8sUD1M1KvDAD+bB7Ht+ZeZOq46TA5 clED/SpP5qsO3NSXr2HSeXBkYEpPr7iAJCyy3dl8OGfH5SKSmgFQlZm9gFXznJZjSnrp +qV9NuyVD1SglYe+R9EsA6/1x0+Ea6aimgVnw0gwOHZHgYuQn+Pwxqlq5tV/uaa1z3gi Cg1OJRJ+/r9QqrOX+pfP7gjjthqRG+exyinWxph/nQgscWrq0YMgls2MFm6D5WATwRgq s6fg== X-Received: by 10.112.128.169 with SMTP id np9mr2377283lbb.73.1436249051423; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 23:04:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 09:04:09 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? Message-ID: <20150707060409.GB14357@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <1436006726 DOT 677 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150706200609 DOT GD24178 AT localhost DOT localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 12:21:50AM +0000, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > I am not a contributor as yet but I would appreciate anyone who > removes some of the bogosity of this list. > http://ljh4timm.home.xs4all.nl/gaf/dox_libgeda/todo.html > > Granted most of this is kind of self explanatory but there are parts > that are not so obvious. If no one else does it I probably will > eventually. If you mean all those 'Finish function documentation!!!', I know that many developers are trying to fix them while writing code. This is not really easy to fix documentation of a function if you don't know what it does. Some other devs don't bother, though, and even add new such lines. I believe we'll eventually fix them. Cheers, Vladimir