X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=mniHs+0RKVOgqffBY58rU/gQ0PoGda77u5vubX5AcTY=; b=iDK5ojjjqsoYI/AtCiVk3iWcyljbcca64VyiEG0JylznTNPIhZiIleVKOLCUYXf/rA MyBvZWNXs27XAX1l5KsN6cXuh6IPia2qpfyLrUvqvA/XRL+PZZH4ZRtpXDX+yPTZx56Q mzOoBr9fiynyormUQSdnffNOC+hgO0MTVWmoa8nYBQnEXANvb8/UYN2F9jo3rj5K7Azu vykiS9hZvjJ/W6PTBMl7qN1G1RL0tpPecvQgWypjNM+RqTewnyq1WbshWzUHUSF7fi74 1YAw5BMEzeZMhRD9pNqeGAoTKfsqwoXqdLqclY3OifypQWKhS8CsA87vlu6xI4CcY28p fiow== X-Received: by 10.112.145.132 with SMTP id su4mr2276106lbb.85.1436248651371; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 22:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 08:57:27 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? Message-ID: <20150707055726.GA14357@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <1436006726 DOT 677 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150706200609 DOT GD24178 AT localhost DOT localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 02:11:27PM -0800, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) > [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 12:45:26PM +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote: > > ... > >> I know that gEDA documentation is verbose and ugly -- but no one will > > Stefan, > > If you think some part of the documentation is ugly, please file a bug > > report on this adding the info you want to see changed/added/... or > > do this here. We certainly lack people who could read and edit the > > documentation we have or submit constructive changes to apply. > > I doubt it's worth bothering. I tried years ago and was told to go away. > They like the docs the way they are, complete with wordy descriptions > of self and bad instructions on how to use git. We could try at the moment. Do you have any concrete proposals? I can add/remove something in the wiki if you don't want to get access to it yourself (which is easy). Note, I am not a native English speaker, and writing and fixing the documentation in English is difficult for me, but I'm trying to do this from time to time. Cheers, Vladimir