X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tmpwZgjGLDG7ibPB/hxE1K+IU3ahBxgheXU4UgF7FlU=; b=JvqsLaKbGRHV5spjg13KPZe9uIsr7BM4a5aLwJnabnJ6MaWUWmoaSEpMCnEpW3Lwt4 xV65yAw7oMf6eiPOcqgbvGO5qNvlD0QhGhPAZmk430jLNxyrU0G1J6Q0lU77Ax8w6IxV 82WAVnbDk1b/0OXX9BjF4901ocfFfQaTlKAiHaGoBl1+XG6EhPwUw2YQIUJE5P4pC209 oERfGNMld7zuRrQ+14PbcQO+wMs1cM89dtVqnUzYssZeLVE0sNuPpF51XD8KiO9BPLEM FRryqGyq+T0EtR6X3HF8jOjGJAYs3D/H+J2iesdK0t0FmEEacF38KzW6M7sJP793Jp9k VpCg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.212.9 with SMTP id ng9mr1736908lbc.57.1436235992016; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 19:26:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <01F6BB66-F457-4FAB-AD51-9997368E1A6F@noqsi.com> References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <1436006726 DOT 677 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150706200609 DOT GD24178 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <01F6BB66-F457-4FAB-AD51-9997368E1A6F AT noqsi DOT com> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 02:26:31 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t672QbIk012240 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk I was not suggesting you were the obstinate one. You know I am probably recalling and old disagreement on this list. On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:46 AM, John Doty wrote: > > On Jul 6, 2015, at 6:23 PM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > >> John, So then why do people fight to keep gEDA using Scheme? > > Who’s fighting? > >> I am not >> saying we should remove it but pushing development on top of it seems >> backwards. > > I keep developing gnetlist back ends in Scheme because I’m building on what exists. > > John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. > http://www.noqsi.com/ > jpd AT noqsi DOT com > > > -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/