X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=UG7YQMY9SDx6dbJ25r8KAlB+UsdmLkuiBf4GSxSj9gY=; b=ckF705EKWijZ3AAx7lPHfIckkKIaeluxfF4yQgYmCRYmQZ5J0bwBzhihxOskFb8iFM sc4gkR58aM8woJRotqvaUKlXnm6aRxobp3Zk1yR9t+M9R3nBA4tlBLLZi207egce7J7k n0plI/UI+7PB9UQGjUNm50Usx5RgSsAyjbfbDW1JqCAToX9SHdaru5P5LUUdOX1HRyWW 8QwzaU9A2UzRN6fTBSTFuB0OejrABlryT88gC5DvoeYgNmnw1M2N4EWYsHOvPNkctDLx fY+pnE7bYot7jizl8Cf8nrJGTRKWWvmNmf4A0pq8XaRxFFKzZxzhFDcvs6r/CkHvCYMv nhiA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.26.163 with SMTP id m3mr1397655lag.86.1436228510929; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 17:21:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <1436006726 DOT 677 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150706200609 DOT GD24178 AT localhost DOT localdomain> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 00:21:50 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? From: "Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk I am not a contributor as yet but I would appreciate anyone who removes some of the bogosity of this list. http://ljh4timm.home.xs4all.nl/gaf/dox_libgeda/todo.html Granted most of this is kind of self explanatory but there are parts that are not so obvious. If no one else does it I probably will eventually. On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) > [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 12:45:26PM +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote: >> ... >>> I know that gEDA documentation is verbose and ugly -- but no one will >> Stefan, >> If you think some part of the documentation is ugly, please file a bug >> report on this adding the info you want to see changed/added/... or >> do this here. We certainly lack people who could read and edit the >> documentation we have or submit constructive changes to apply. > > I doubt it's worth bothering. I tried years ago and was told to go away. > They like the docs the way they are, complete with wordy descriptions > of self and bad instructions on how to use git. > > Britton -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/ On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) > [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 12:45:26PM +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote: >> ... >>> I know that gEDA documentation is verbose and ugly -- but no one will >> Stefan, >> If you think some part of the documentation is ugly, please file a bug >> report on this adding the info you want to see changed/added/... or >> do this here. We certainly lack people who could read and edit the >> documentation we have or submit constructive changes to apply. > > I doubt it's worth bothering. I tried years ago and was told to go away. > They like the docs the way they are, complete with wordy descriptions > of self and bad instructions on how to use git. > > Britton -- Home http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/ Work http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/