X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] OT-PL/M From: John Doty In-Reply-To: <559B0A29.7040403@neurotica.com> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 18:02:39 -0600 Message-Id: References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20150703191532 DOT GB21182 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150705021010 DOT 369968038A2C AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> <559AC9B8 DOT 7020205 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <1343E2EB-4A4D-46E0-BD87-FCBD230A1C50 AT noqsi DOT com> <559B0A29 DOT 7040403 AT neurotica DOT com> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t6702lgV032037 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Jul 6, 2015, at 5:07 PM, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > On 07/06/2015 06:37 PM, John Doty wrote: >>> More history: In the early 80s, IBM first went to Gary Kildall of >>> CP/M for their IBM-PC DOS. CP/M did have several PL/M modules (pip >>> for one). If Gary had not ignored IBM and go sailing instead of >>> meeting with the IBM execs, IBM PC-DOS may have had some PL/M in >>> it. However, we got ms-dos instead. As I understand it, Kildall >>> used a DEC PDP minicomputer running a PL/M cross compiler in order >>> to develop CP/M. >> >> Must have been one of the bigger DEC machines. He wrote the PL/M >> cross compiler in Fortran, and it needed at least a 32 bit machine. >> PDP-10, PDP-20, or VAX maybe. > > Please pardon me for butting in, but someone mentioned PDPs, so.. ;) > > The PL/M was done on a PDP-10 (DECsystem-10), a 36-bit machine. I assume you mean the original development. The actual code was supposed to run on any Fortran with a big enough word size. The code certainly looked very friendly to IBM Fortran IV, but I can’t say I tried it in that environment. I certainly didn’t encounter any use of the peculiar DEC Fortran extensions I’ve seen in other code. > > The VAX was announced about five years after Kildall began CP/M > development. That's right, I wasn’t thinking. 70’s, 80’s, it’s all a blur... > > (Nit: there's no such thing as a PDP-20, but there are DECsystem-20s, > which are PDP-10s.) I’d forgotten that nit, but now my three remaining brain cells are saying yes. > >> In ’75 we upgraded our Intellec system to an 8080, and of course we >> had to upgrade PL/M as well. One application of that system was Jeff >> Bokor’s bachelor’s thesis, an early digital CCD camera. Jeff went on >> to be one of the inventors of the FinFET: there are probably hundreds >> of millions of those in the computer in front of you. > > Aren't the "FinFETs" in modern microprocessors not the same thing that > Bokor et al developed more recently? As with all inventions, the origins are murky if you look closely enough, and there are variations. I recall the idea of surrounding the channel with gates from an early description of FET technology from the 1960’s. It was part of a pedagogical presentation, which then went on to explain that real FETs used a planar structure. Jeff was certainly involved in the revival of this idea, but I’m not straying any farther into the territory of patent lawyers ;-) John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com