X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
         :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
         :user-agent;
        bh=HAyFfEPpTWgARKPKv/bfA8t86DR5n2GFpmku9UFs3Ic=;
        b=edkjJkpwpMf2xpm5zqTqOk0v7sKeSJQZrb94De38pYUI5v49OuHxQQ5n6J/U2VKdVk
         C7uKUTvQLLiW7YDKiriCNo1zNHdHTyI1HC/pXlk9piKGj3ptJGmVOP+vvlV/7BTYEkAh
         VCPtDbxxWkvSjlS5pIxG/jCAcTqqGhDDWT6hHboM3NuhCpaMABxT+xw1wLf13SWZpPdd
         oy0Ze7CTVZglNQc23/mmbUHksXTNGT/7WoGfIlwyoe45G9ya3zPGl8d52D+27EPFwk9k
         1XIGlGru1SQD6+iK2Ab8CM579cuhAUQWZcOLVKKjKziyxiYd8RsvtjugPld9L6bBxDrX
         spLA==
X-Received: by 10.113.4.135 with SMTP id ce7mr598874lbd.18.1436213172308;
        Mon, 06 Jul 2015 13:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 23:06:09 +0300
From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
Message-ID: <20150706200609.GD24178@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
 <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
 <CAFC5WMoa2-z6bNca_bQN+jmMR260UBmoJQybUzH=L2TrBpzNNA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
 <1436006726 DOT 677 DOT 13 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1436006726.677.13.camel@ssalewski.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Jul 04, 2015 at 12:45:26PM +0200, Stefan Salewski wrote:
...
> I know that gEDA documentation is verbose and ugly -- but no one will
Stefan,
If you think some part of the documentation is ugly, please file a bug
report on this adding the info you want to see changed/added/... or
do this here. We certainly lack people who could read and edit the
documentation we have or submit constructive changes to apply. 

Thanks,
  Vladimir