X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=9nDJyj28C/qN7h+yxM+OljdyJOMy+FyXMBhz7xZAXsA=; b=i/cMOGTvS51rkj9axjsks8HjdzCH2ZMT0b+TIvHS381YpaPpU1Jwd46DVoqiGB2qGg K4usHbLeOD2IosT8G0CPr9x4/B20iEooA8mxKR+rzRbu1Y/O5zVCwndB9Bk6eUCnpN3f QttyITmf4igmYpLci6Ka6mqgpIFk8lN2y2RSAfmsW5Gw9N7N5R71/kVmlq+3M6GqL157 Tm57gMAGuzMVJhK9hxNuRd3P2qPBNfy9Pkpt9iXpitb7Z4V/O1Goh7fWZXRYWs7R0KCu TgyzTXSDaW2jtojuEp1deGO0BPQApfjfX3ZQclM9iRkD9WngdptT8ol+UItD7vrHwe9u 21gw== X-Received: by 10.112.40.99 with SMTP id w3mr491494lbk.55.1436212225934; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 22:50:23 +0300 From: "Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: [geda-user] libgeda3 Message-ID: <20150706195023.GB24178@localhost.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com References: <20150704082231 DOT GB27619 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150706160054 DOT GA24178 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150706174952 DOT GA1057 AT alpha2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150706174952.GA1057@alpha2> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 07:49:52PM +0200, Ivan Stankovic (pokemon AT fly DOT srk DOT fer DOT hr) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: ... > Sadly, my own attempt hasn't been successful, either: > > http://repo.or.cz/w/geda-gaf/ivan.git/shortlog/refs/heads/libeda > (see two last commits on that branch) > > My original intention wasn't as ambitious as Peter's, but it did > begin to show a path toward a better libgeda (with emphasis on > documentation and unit testing), that one would then be able to > use as a foundation. A lot of work. FWIW, unlike some other developers, I'd prefer to see that work in the main repository (say, as a separate branch) and don't see any reason to bury it from others so deeply. At least, other developers could look it through and use what they like from the code. Otherwise, all those repos on repo.or.cz or github become a lost effort, never used and of interest to anybody. (And I believe that little but steady steps are better than large jumps from time to time.) Cheers, Vladimir