X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38 X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive? From: John Doty In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 10:50:09 -0600 Message-Id: <3F233658-674A-4851-8F5E-ED70D6D25839@noqsi.com> References: <1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> <20150703191532 DOT GB21182 AT localhost DOT localdomain> <20150705021010 DOT 369968038A2C AT turkos DOT aspodata DOT se> To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t66GoIdq001602 Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On Jul 6, 2015, at 9:41 AM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote: > John, just to take things even farther off topic did you know MIT no > longer uses Scheme for 6.001? Yep. It’s Python. > > (I went to Northeastern, but some of the MIT people I know are still > unhappy about it) Indeed. They should get over it. Scheme never worked well as an introduction to programming. It was more hazing than education. You normally must first master the concrete and practical aspects of an area of knowledge to be able to appreciate a more abstract and theoretical approach. John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd. http://www.noqsi.com/ jpd AT noqsi DOT com